Labels, publishers, distributors, and collectives are being asked the same question: can AI use this catalog, and under what terms. Answering it well, at scale, takes infrastructure built for the rights holder, not the AI company.
Musical AI is that infrastructure. It begins where every deal has to begin, with consent, and follows the catalog through to the value it earns.
A major clearing a deep back catalog. An independent publisher protecting its writers. A distributor acting for thousands of small holders. A collective representing its members. The commercial terms differ; the underlying need does not: know what every controlling contributor has agreed to, across every work you represent.
Before a catalog can be licensed to AI, someone has to say yes, per contributor, per feature, per rights category. Musical AI captures that consent and keeps a live inventory of what every work is cleared to do.
Consent is the first step, not the last. The same record that proves what your catalog is cleared to do is what will structure the deals built on it, attribute how AI uses the work, and route value back to the people who agreed. Consent is live today. The rest is the direction.
SEE HOW CONSENT WORKS →A short conversation is usually enough to determine fit.
Request a conversation
CONTACT SALES